The “Moron” Has a Tariff Strategy: How Trump Is Outsmarting the Global Elite.
- Apr 24
- 5 min read
Part 2
By Damian Fernandez
Trump’s Genius Global Trade Gambit — That the MSM is desperately trying to ridicule. Now, in Part 2, we explore Trump’s real endgame - the tariff strategy.
In Part 1 of this series, we exposed how the U.S.–China tariff war is not just about unfair trade or economic rivalry. It’s a deliberate and strategic assault on the Deep State—an entrenched globalist elite network that has enabled China’s rise at America’s expense. The imposition of tariffs under the Trump administration was never a random outburst of economic nationalism, as the mainstream media would have you believe. It’s the beginning of a much broader strategy. The fact that the main stream media is desperately trying to ridicule everything about Trump’s genius gambit, can only mean that the Deep State is in full blown panic.
And now, in Part 2, we explore Trump’s real endgame - the tariff strategy.
What if Trump’s so-called “trade war” was in fact a clever geopolitical chess move designed not just to hit China, but to unite the rest of the world in a new, multi-polar trading system—one that breaks China’s monopolistic grip on global supply chains and simultaneously starves the Deep State of its primary weapon? The MSM keeps hyperventilating about Trump waging a reckless tariff war. But what if his real plan is to unite the world and crush the Deep State’s dream of global control?
🌍Trump’s tariffs are leverage. His strategy is sovereignty.
A Global Call to Action
Trump's strategy may hinge on more than just American resilience. It likely involves persuading key global players—India, Japan, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa—to re-imagine their own trade relationships with China. Rather than isolate America through punitive tariffs, Trump could be offering a simple deal to other nations:
Impose reasonable tariffs on Chinese exports to your markets—create space for domestic industries and local jobs—and in return, America lowers tariffs on your exports to the U.S.
This is not protectionism; it’s economic diplomacy on a global scale.
Such a move would encourage reciprocal trade fairness, reduce dependence on China’s manufacturing hegemony, and rebuild sovereign industrial capacities worldwide. It’s a strategy that not only balances America’s trade deficit but helps re-balance the global economy in a post-China-centric direction. It restores leverage to nations that were previously coerced into dependency.
Undermining the Deep State’s Supply Chain Empire
China didn’t become the “world’s factory” by accident. It was systematically enabled—by global financiers, multinationals, and policy makers aligned with the Deep State agenda. These actors deliberately gutted U.S. manufacturing, off shored entire sectors, and built China’s dominance brick by brick under the cover of globalization.
But China may now be the victim of its own success.
For decades, Beijing bet on a future in which America remained led by compromised elites—career politicians and bureaucrats from both parties who believed in dismantling U.S. economic sovereignty for the sake of a centralized, technocratic One World Government. With these people in power, China believed it couldn’t lose. The American Deep State was building China’s ascent while simultaneously weakening America from within.
Unsurprisingly, Beijing miscalculated.
What China didn’t anticipate was a leader like Donald Trump—a man focused not on globalist appeasement but on restoring American strength and dignity. They didn’t expect someone willing to blow up the entire status quo. Nor did they seem to grasp that in a One World Government scenario, they themselves would eventually be pulled under the same centralized control. Would the technocratic global elite truly have allowed China to operate freely outside their system? Or did China imagine it could remain the enforcer while avoiding subjugation?
This is where the cracks begin to show. The Deep State’s dream is a world with no borders, no independent governments, and no national pride. That includes China. And if Trump’s strategy succeeds, it won't just derail their vision for America—it will collapse the entire architecture of global control. The elite’s blueprint for a centralized global economy—controlled via international institutions, ESG-driven compliance systems, and a technocratic financial order—would be shattered.
Did Trump Invoke the IEEPA to Impose the Tariffs?
What is the IEEPA?
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), passed in 1977, gives the President broad authority to regulate commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the U.S. that originates at least in substantial part outside the country.
The IEEPA does not grant the President the power to unilaterally impose or increase tariffs. That power resides primarily with Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.
So how has Trump imposed tariffs without Congress?
Trump leveraged other laws, not IEEPA to impose tariffs, including:
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974
Used to retaliate against unfair foreign trade practices (used against China).
This is where Trump’s big tariff moves on China came from.
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
Used to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, claiming national security concerns.
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974
Allows tariffs to protect domestic industries seriously injured by increased imports.
These laws, though not designed for global economic restructuring, give the executive broad discretion. Legal challenges have been launched, but courts have so far generally upheld presidential discretion in these matters.
A New Multilateral Trade Architecture?
Could this be the birth of a new trade alliance? One that rivals the WTO and rejects the broken promises of globalism? Perhaps the Trump administration envisions a parallel framework—call it a “Fair Trade Coalition”—made up of sovereign nations acting in mutual self-interest, free from elite manipulation.
Within this bloc:
Member nations reduce tariffs among themselves based on shared goals of industrial growth, energy independence and digital sovereignty.
Chinese exports are penalized across the board until they comply with real trade reciprocity and labor standards.
Trade becomes a tool for sovereignty and strength—not control and dependence.
This would be an existential blow to the global elite. The One World Government project hinges on economic centralization. Break that, and the entire structure begins to crack.
Convincing the World to Play Ball
How can Trump pull this off? Simple—through leverage.
The U.S. market is still the most coveted consumer base on Earth. Access to it remains the ultimate incentive.
The global south and rising economies are tired of being pawns in a U.S.–China power game. They want independence—and fair terms.
America under Trump offers a trade-based pathway to sovereignty, whereas China offers entrapment, and the Deep State offers surveillance and control.
In this light, Trump becomes not an economic wrecking ball, but a diplomatic architect—redesigning world trade to serve nations, not elites.
If Trump Fails…
If Trump fails in this strategy—if he’s prevented from rallying the world against China's economic empire, if he’s taken out by law-fare, media sabotage, or worse, the consequences will be catastrophic:
China solidifies its position at the center of global supply chains.
The Deep State doubles down on the "rules-based international order," consolidating power through institutions like the IMF, WHO, and WEF.
America becomes further dependent, weakened militarily, culturally, and economically.
The dream of national sovereignty is replaced by a dystopian techno-feudalism—run by unelected global managers in Davos and Brussels.
This is why the attacks against Trump are so vicious. Why media talking heads froth at the mouth over every tariff. Why elites around the world are panicking. Because they see the plan—and it threatens everything they've built.
Note: The above article references various public statements and policy documents, including President Trump's invocation of the several statutes to impose tariffs, as detailed in official White House fact sheets and trade policy agendas. Additionally, it considers critiques and analyses from mainstream media sources and economic experts to provide a comprehensive perspective.
Comentarios